Upholding the principles of transparency, efficiency and fairness, ICEAI focuses on providing impetus for disseminating knowledge and technologies worldwide by performing its obligations as conference organizer. 

For academics, professionals, students, engineers, practitioners and stakeholders in their respective subject areas, the opportunities of meeting each other, conveying and communicating insights and thoughts are significant to give their career a higher profile. For those who wish to join a scholarly conference, to a large extent, they wish their work could be involved in the conference proceedings, be published and be able to read by more audiences in the scientific research communities. As proceedings publication becomes one of the major considerations for a successful conference, we furnish guidelines for authors and reviewers, describing how paper and abstract will be handled after submission. The organizers and all committee members of ICEAI encourage you to contribute your latest work to this conference.

Author Checklist

1. Title page (authorship, affiliation, competing for interest)

2. Length of full paper

3. Authorship statement

4. Spelling and grammar errors

5. References are in the correct format

6. All references mentioned in the Reference list are cited in the text, and vice versa

Peer Review Policy: Double-Blind 

The author's names, affiliation, acknowledgment and other related personal information will not be revealed to reviewers. And reviewers will keep anonymous to authors.

Initial Check

1. Submitted papers must correspond to one of the topics of the conference

2. Incomplete Structure 

3. Over length (more than 10 pages)

4. Plagiarism and self-plagiarism

5. Low-quality tables or figures

6. Spelling or grammar errors

Peer Review

1. The paper will be reviewed by at least two reviewers.

2. Revisions may be requested during the review process.

3. The second peer review may be requested after major revision.

4. The final decisions of acceptance or rejection are made by the Chair/Editor in Chief.

Criteria

1. Originality and Novelty

2. Scientific soundness and significance

3. Quality of presentation

4. English level

Editorial Decision

Accept

The paper is accepted and does not need further modification.

Accept with minor revisions

The paper will be accepted after minor revisions. In such a case, the revised paper will only be reviewed by the Chair.

Revaluate with major revisions

The paper will be sent to be reviewed by the original reviewers (unless they opt out) or assessed by the Chair.

Reject

The paper will not be accepted due to major deficiencies. And it is not recommended to be resubmitted.

Revision

Authors must revise their papers within the allowed time. Manuscripts with major revisions will be sent to original reviewers for the second-round review. Manuscripts with minor revisions will usually be reviewed by the Chair. The final decision will be made by the Chair after careful and unbiased assessment.

Changes the Authorship

Before the online publication, authors should submit an Authorship Change Form if they wish to add, remove or rearrange the authors of the paper.